| Two things
I dont do anymore are write about music and write
for free; Ive made an exception for the recently released
Kiss box set. My thoughts, exclusive to watershedcentral.com:
When Gene is on, hes on. Going Blind
and Nothing to Lose are great, great songs. Hes like
a bridge between Mountain and Screaming Trees. (On the second
thought, Mountain and Screaming Trees dont need a
bridge.)
The mid-80s period up holds better
than expected, though Crazy Nights really sucks. Hot in
the Shade is a sleeper. Colins often made the point
that Paul carried the band on his back for the better part
of the decade. Between Creatures of the Night and Revenge,
Simmons showed up only for the photo shoots.
Genes and Pauls personalities
show through in the liner notes. Paul comes off as well-meaning
and earnest. He finds things to like about Shandi, God love
him. Simmons is a cock. He demands credit for anything that
bears the slightest trace of his fingerprints, and hes
never critical of himself. Note how he blames Paul for inspiring
him to write a dumb song like Christine Sixteen. Yeah, Gene,
you were really channeling Kierkegaard there. To know Simmons,
I imagine, would be not to like him.
Wisely the band didnt allow Peter Criss
to write many liner notes: Hes borderline retarded.
Paul and Gene seem to regard Ace as some kind of savant,
which is kind of cool. Hes the bands Garbo.
Why Take Me was left off this set is beyond
me. If I were in band, wed cover that.
T.L. has noted the irony that Love Gun is
so good musically, so insipid lyrically. Hes right.
Quintessential Ace solo: Got to Choose, though
its tough to pick just one.
Finally, Im not one to fuss about the
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, but Kiss should be in. My thinking
is, if you welcome the Grateful Dead (a band with suspect
material but a rabid fan base), then Kiss should be there,
too.
- David Martin
|